on 1984 by George Orwell for my Civil Resistance class, Prauge
--Two Minutes Hate--building people up to be as angry as possible, encouraging agression and teaching violence and bigotry. it's easier than people would suspect to attack the rational and appreciative part of peoples' minds with blind rage. how important, though, to channel and control that emotion so that it isn't turned in the wrong direction. it's difficult to control thoughtcrime.
--Children--raised by the state and not by their parents. but what are their parents other than agents of the state? frightening, though, that not even homes can remain out of the state's control. the kids were out of the sphere of independent thought or morality that could possibly come from their parents. off-colour and biased slogans. violence. hate in droves. sneakiness. that's absolutely disgusting.
"There was a link of understanding between them, more important than affection or partisanship."
--Family--his family, as a child, had the virtue of being united for no reason other than love. Rearden (in Ayn Rand's 'Atlas Shrugged') damned that quality in his own familial relationships. but we see the parsons and their children devoid of any family ties. is that what we want?
--Logic & Absolutes--they create their own reality but we already know that isn't possible (right, Frank?). so what are we going to call this altered reality? a lie. and there isn't any tangible way to prove it, but the universe keeps record of its dealings. there is logic and there is a truth, and somebody knows it. but when anyone can claim absolute knowledge of something, who knows who actually has authority to say their version of the truth? facts are subjective. dos there exist any tangible record of Caesar but his words?
--Words & Thoughts--the purpose of words is to express oneself. the puspose of lots of words is to express oneself well. there is no need for words if people don't have thoughts, and the less people think, the less words are necessary, and so the less people know how to think because words aren't even available to them, in a gigantic circle that will end in Newspeak, which is nospeak.
--Speaking--what are the words that we hear? what are the words that we say? it is possible to speak but not actually be saying a single thing: the man who's face one cannot remember, the man who has no eyes. and some people say too much eve, if they're right: Rearden said things that people would prefer to be kept quiet--people didn't want things to be said because they didn't want them to be so obvious. he would have been silenced by Newspeak. but he wouldn't have kept quiet. thankfully.
--Agreement/Consent--damn them, they who nod in agreement to save their own skins, even against the vilest evil possible. wouldn't you rather be dead than live like that?! why don't they fight against it? but what can they do, really, sacrifice themselves for nothing? but how do they fight? i would rather sacrifice myself, not for the cause, but because i wouldn't be able to live like that. for them, there is something tangible that they're betraying by NOT saying. but what about for us, and our battle that is much more subtle? what things are we allowing by our mere acceptance of 'the way things are'?
--Sex and Love--the Party condemns it as an evil. but what about it is evil? the attachment, maybe, or the loyalty. but they suppress their sexual desire, i think in order to kill any desire and passion and individuality and preference and whatever else. so every time we suppress our desires, does that mean we're dying inside?
"I understand HOW: I do not understand WHY."
--Logic & Absolutes (cont.)--the knowledge of some distant piece of evidence (not memory but EVIDENCE) was enough to shake the lie. even if the lie is all around, you know you're not lying in your own mind when there is tangible proof to back it up.
"Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows."
--Logic & Absolutes (cont.)--absolutes follow logic and reason and real existence. we must hold onto that.
--Perception-- the proles only see/remember little things, so are useless when trying to make an analysis or reach an understanding about anything as a whole. the Party members only see/remember the big picture, and can't even look at anything close enough to see its true nature.
how perfectly awful.
if nothing else, communism and fascism and dictatorship brought about really brilliant literature.
--Two Minutes Hate--building people up to be as angry as possible, encouraging agression and teaching violence and bigotry. it's easier than people would suspect to attack the rational and appreciative part of peoples' minds with blind rage. how important, though, to channel and control that emotion so that it isn't turned in the wrong direction. it's difficult to control thoughtcrime.
--Children--raised by the state and not by their parents. but what are their parents other than agents of the state? frightening, though, that not even homes can remain out of the state's control. the kids were out of the sphere of independent thought or morality that could possibly come from their parents. off-colour and biased slogans. violence. hate in droves. sneakiness. that's absolutely disgusting.
"There was a link of understanding between them, more important than affection or partisanship."
--Family--his family, as a child, had the virtue of being united for no reason other than love. Rearden (in Ayn Rand's 'Atlas Shrugged') damned that quality in his own familial relationships. but we see the parsons and their children devoid of any family ties. is that what we want?
--Logic & Absolutes--they create their own reality but we already know that isn't possible (right, Frank?). so what are we going to call this altered reality? a lie. and there isn't any tangible way to prove it, but the universe keeps record of its dealings. there is logic and there is a truth, and somebody knows it. but when anyone can claim absolute knowledge of something, who knows who actually has authority to say their version of the truth? facts are subjective. dos there exist any tangible record of Caesar but his words?
--Words & Thoughts--the purpose of words is to express oneself. the puspose of lots of words is to express oneself well. there is no need for words if people don't have thoughts, and the less people think, the less words are necessary, and so the less people know how to think because words aren't even available to them, in a gigantic circle that will end in Newspeak, which is nospeak.
--Speaking--what are the words that we hear? what are the words that we say? it is possible to speak but not actually be saying a single thing: the man who's face one cannot remember, the man who has no eyes. and some people say too much eve, if they're right: Rearden said things that people would prefer to be kept quiet--people didn't want things to be said because they didn't want them to be so obvious. he would have been silenced by Newspeak. but he wouldn't have kept quiet. thankfully.
--Agreement/Consent--damn them, they who nod in agreement to save their own skins, even against the vilest evil possible. wouldn't you rather be dead than live like that?! why don't they fight against it? but what can they do, really, sacrifice themselves for nothing? but how do they fight? i would rather sacrifice myself, not for the cause, but because i wouldn't be able to live like that. for them, there is something tangible that they're betraying by NOT saying. but what about for us, and our battle that is much more subtle? what things are we allowing by our mere acceptance of 'the way things are'?
--Sex and Love--the Party condemns it as an evil. but what about it is evil? the attachment, maybe, or the loyalty. but they suppress their sexual desire, i think in order to kill any desire and passion and individuality and preference and whatever else. so every time we suppress our desires, does that mean we're dying inside?
"I understand HOW: I do not understand WHY."
--Logic & Absolutes (cont.)--the knowledge of some distant piece of evidence (not memory but EVIDENCE) was enough to shake the lie. even if the lie is all around, you know you're not lying in your own mind when there is tangible proof to back it up.
"Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows."
--Logic & Absolutes (cont.)--absolutes follow logic and reason and real existence. we must hold onto that.
--Perception-- the proles only see/remember little things, so are useless when trying to make an analysis or reach an understanding about anything as a whole. the Party members only see/remember the big picture, and can't even look at anything close enough to see its true nature.
how perfectly awful.
if nothing else, communism and fascism and dictatorship brought about really brilliant literature.
